PEMBELAJARAN RESPONS PEMBACA HUJAN DI BULAN JUNI: EMOSI, BUDAYA, REFLEKSI
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
Studi ini melihat bagaimana novel Hujan di Bulan Juni karya Sapardi Djoko Damono dapat digunakan untuk mengajar sastra dengan menggunakan pendekatan respons pembaca. Metode ini menekankan bahwa pembaca bertanggung jawab untuk menciptakan makna berdasarkan pengalaman pribadi, konteks budaya, dan tanggapan emosional mereka. Novel ini, yang berkembang dari puisi liris, menyajikan tema cinta yang dihalangi oleh perbedaan budaya dan identitas. Dengan simbolisme yang mendalam seperti hujan, diam, dan jarak, itu sangat layak untuk pembacaan yang berpikir kritis. Studi ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif-deskriptif dan melibatkan siswa di kelas XI SMA. Kegiatan pembelajaran berfokus pada membaca, berbicara, menulis jurnal, dan membuat puisi atau surat fiktif. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa respons siswa termasuk dalam empat kategori utama: afektif, psikologis, sosiokultural, dan estetis. Pembelajaran berbasis tanggapan pembaca dapat mendorong kreativitas literer, empati, dan pemahaman budaya siswa. Metode respons pembaca disarankan untuk diterapkan pada karya sastra Indonesia kontemporer lainnya. Metode ini mendukung pembelajaran sastra yang lebih humanistik, inklusif, dan kontekstual selain meningkatkan minat baca. Agar siswa tidak hanya memahami teks, tetapi juga mengalami dan memaknainya secara pribadi, guru harus mendorong tanggapan pembaca secara kreatif dan kritis.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal Pembelajaran Sastra (Journal of Literary Education) as publisher of the journal, and the author also holds the copyright without restriction.
Copyright encompasses exclusive rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations. The reproduction of any part of this journal, its storage in databases and its transmission by any form or media, such as electronic, electrostatic and mechanical copies, photocopies, recordings, magnetic media, etc. , are allowed with a written permission from Jurnal Pembelajaran Sastra (Journal of Literary Education).
Jurnal Pembelajaran Sastra (Journal of Literary Education), the Editors and the Advisory International Editorial Board make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in the Jurnal Pembelajaran Sastra (Journal of Literary Education) are sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
References
Beach, R. (1993). A teacher’s introduction to reader-response theories. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Benton, M., & Fox, G. (1985). Teaching literature: Nine to fourteen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blau, S. D. (2003). The literature workshop: Teaching texts and their readers. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Booth, W. C. (1988). The company we keep: An ethics of fiction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Corrie, M. (2018). Engaging with reader response theory in multicultural literature classrooms. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 61(5), 543–551. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.711
Damono, S. D. (2015). Hujan di Bulan Juni (novel). Yogyakarta: Bentang Pustaka.
Davies, M. (2010). Symbolism and silence: Narrative strategies in modern poetic fiction. The Journal of Literary Studies, 26(3), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/02564710903294756
Fatimah, R. (2020). Penggunaan puisi Sapardi dalam pembelajaran sastra dengan pendekatan respons pembaca. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 5(2), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpbsi.v5i2.112
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.
Hancock, M. R. (2008). A celebration of literature and response: Children, books, and teachers in K–8 classrooms (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Iser, W. (1974). The implied reader: Patterns of communication in prose fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Jauss, H. R. (1982). Toward an aesthetic of reception (T. Bahti, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Langer, J. A. (1994). A response-based approach to reading literature. Albany, NY: National Research Center on Literature Teaching and Learning.
Pramudita, B. (2021). Representasi cinta dan kesunyian dalam puisi Sapardi: Tinjauan psikologis dan budaya. Jurnal Poetika, 9(1), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1234/poetika.v9i1.88
Rahayu, M., Hafshah, M. N. C., & Indriasandi, I. B. (2023). The Cultural Values of Siri'in Bugis Community Represented in Tarung Sarung Film (2020). Pioneer: Journal of Language and Literature, 15(1), 68-83.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (2005). The aesthetic transaction. In J. P. Purves, A. Beach, & D. Appleman (Eds.), Literature and the reader (pp. 15–28). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Ruddell, R. B., & Unrau, N. J. (2004). Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Saraswati,Ekarini dan A Budiman. 2025.Kajian Puisi dengan Pendekatan Respons Pembaca. Malang: UMM Press.Teeuw, A. (1980). Sastra dan ilmu sastra: Pengantar teori sastra. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.
Syahril, M., & Rahayu, M. (2024). Resistensi kultural perempuan dalam novel Hikayat Puti Limau Manih: Singa Betina Rimbo Hulu. Kandai, 20(1), 29-45.
Tompkins, J. P. (Ed.). (1980). Reader-response criticism: From formalism to post-structuralism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.